Dr Tedros is the original monkey and we have a pandemic of evil people
WHO was meant to work on behalf of the world but it’s composition is not one representing the majority of the world.
Judging their past actions and policies, I have come to the conclusion that the WHO is a threat to our collective health and they are not in the position to recommend policy advice to any sane person.
Dr. Tedros and his ilk are meeting on Sunday to begin a four-day meeting (World Health Assembly) on Sunday May 22nd as they continue to close the net on our right to bodily autonomy.
The WHO has launched a plan for a so-called Pandemic Treaty which would give it unprecedented, undemocratic jurisdiction over its 194 member nations.
Under the treaty, the WHO could order mandatory vaccines, digital health IDs, lockdowns, isolation, testing regimes, no-jab-no-job rules, or anything else it decided as policy, irrespective of dissenting voices. If the UK signed up, the Government would lose any sovereign power to decide this country’s fate in the event of another pandemic, or other health issues.
World Health Organisation Treaty An ‘Undemocratic Farce’, News Uncut, 13 April 2022.
The World Health Organization has been promoting this initiative to create a ‘Pandemic Treaty’. Using woke, modern empty language such as ‘to build a more robust global health architecture that will protect future generations’, the Treaty sounds like the crap you hear in movies and on social media.
But like all top down control initiatives of this nature, the devil is in the detail and, often enough, hidden in plain sight.
Rather than offering a detailed critique here, you can consider several critiques by thoughtful scholars in the following articles:
Michael Senger: “By signing onto the Pandemic Treaty, our leaders are signaling their approval for all this—and more—to be done again. Take heart: The Pandemic Treaty won’t annul your national sovereignty. That would be impossible, because you haven’t had any national sovereignty since March 2020. The Pandemic Treaty is simply a reelection for another term.” See “What Does the WHO’s Pandemic Treaty Really Do?”.
James Roguski: ‘These proposed amendments will cede additional sovereignty, control and legal authority over to the World Health Organization.’ See ‘WAKE UP and Smell the Burning of Our Constitution’.
Kit Knightly: The ‘Pandemic Treaty’ would ‘hand supranational powers to an unelected bureaucrat or “expert”, who could exercise them entirely at his own discretion and on completely subjective criteria. This is the very definition of technocratic globalism.’ See ‘“Pandemic Treaty” will hand WHO keys to global government’.
Dr Joseph Mercola: ‘Make no mistake, the WHO pandemic treaty is a direct attack on the sovereignty of its member states, as well as a direct attack on your bodily autonomy.’ See ‘The WHO Pandemic Treaty. A Backdoor to Global Governance: “Stripping Away Individual Rights and Liberties”’.
Professor Anthony J. Hall: ‘The creation of such a treaty would strip away jurisdiction from national, state, and provincial governments. Elected governments would cede away the right to formulate local health care policies through democratic means in the public interest.’ See ‘“Financial Reset” and Economic Warfare against Humanity: How Global Relations Should Be Restructured to Ensure National Sovereignty’.
But it would be unwise to ascribe too much significance to these latest, ongoing encroachments on national sovereignty. As explained above, we have not had any national sovereignty since March 2020!
An even greater and more alarming threat bigger than this treaty is the International Health Regulations (IHR) amendments up for vote at the same World Health Assembly meeting.
The WHO intends to amend 13 IHR articles: 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, 59 and they are:
Increased surveillance: Under Article 5, the WHO will develop early warning criteria that will allow it to establish a risk assessment for a member state, which means that it can use the type of modelling, simulation, and predictions that exaggerated the risk from Covid-19 over two years ago. Once the WHO creates its assessment, it will communicate it to inter-governmental organizations and other member states.
48-hour deadline: Under Articles 6, 10, 11, and 13, a member state is given 48 hours to respond to a WHO risk assessment and accept or reject on-site assistance. However, in practice, this timeline can be reduced to hours, forcing it to comply or face international disapproval led by the WHO and potentially unfriendly member states.
Secret sources: Under Article 9, the WHO can rely on undisclosed sources for information leading it to declare a public health emergency. Those sources could include Big Pharma, WHO funders such as the Gates Foundation and the Gates-founded-and-funded GAVI Alliance, as well as others seeking to monopolize power.
Weakened Sovereignty: Under Article 12, when the WHO receives undisclosed information concerning a purported public health threat in a member state, the Director-General may (not must) consult with the WHO Emergency Committee and the member state. However, s/he can unilaterally declare a potential or actual public health emergency of international concern. The Director General’s authority replaces national sovereign authority. This can later be used to enforce sanctions on nations.
Rejecting the amendments: Under Article 59, after the amendments are adopted by the World Health Assembly, a member state has six months to reject them. This means November, this year. If the member state fails to act, it will be deemed to have accepted the amendments in full. Any rejection or reservation received by the Director-General after the expiry of that period shall have no force and effect.
This is taking place in Geneva, Switzerland from 22 to 28 May 2022!
And are you surprised that almost the same time for the meeting we are hearing of another outbreak? Monkeypox?
Governments are in lock step..
From crisis to crisis, remember? Cue in another pandemic exercise..
We have to do what we can by calling attention to this continuous, open corruption that is escalating a dystopian centralization of public health.
This harmful model of Release, Fear and Vaccinate assumes that only one entity, WHO, understands how to manage the health policy of every nation – and by implication, the health of each and every individual. It also assumes, incorrectly, that Big Pharma’s controversial model of medicine which is the WHO’s preferred model – is the expert guide to better health and wellness.
WHO is a threat!! #StopTheTreaty
See you tomorrow.
- Ope